<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 514 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341544</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal set aside all issues raised in the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to reframe the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The decision aimed to rectify errors in the penalty calculation and ensure compliance with directions given by the CIT(A) in the quantum appeal orders. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present necessary evidence during the reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 514 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341544</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal set aside all issues raised in the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to reframe the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The decision aimed to rectify errors in the penalty calculation and ensure compliance with directions given by the CIT(A) in the quantum appeal orders. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present necessary evidence during the reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>