<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7506</link>
    <description>Earlier-year expenditure carried forward in accounts is deductible in a later assessment year only where a regularly and consistently employed accounting method requires that treatment; no such method was established, so the deduction was unavailable. Profits from sales of unascertained gypsum accrued at Jamsar because appropriation occurred there, railway receipts were in buyers&#039; names, goods moved at their risk, and the seller retained no lien; the profits therefore accrued in Part B State. Litigation expenditure incurred to secure an additional lease right and ward off competition was capital in nature because it protected or created an enduring asset, and was not deductible as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7506</link>
      <description>Earlier-year expenditure carried forward in accounts is deductible in a later assessment year only where a regularly and consistently employed accounting method requires that treatment; no such method was established, so the deduction was unavailable. Profits from sales of unascertained gypsum accrued at Jamsar because appropriation occurred there, railway receipts were in buyers&#039; names, goods moved at their risk, and the seller retained no lien; the profits therefore accrued in Part B State. Litigation expenditure incurred to secure an additional lease right and ward off competition was capital in nature because it protected or created an enduring asset, and was not deductible as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>