<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 502 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341532</link>
    <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 due to non-compliance with the requirement of paying 7.5% of the demand at the time of filing. The petitioner was given four weeks to fulfill this condition, after which the appeal would be restored for further proceedings, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 502 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341532</link>
      <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 due to non-compliance with the requirement of paying 7.5% of the demand at the time of filing. The petitioner was given four weeks to fulfill this condition, after which the appeal would be restored for further proceedings, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>