https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341525 The appeal concerned whether the impugned order could stand in light of earlier binding determinations on manufacture by sub-contractors, offloading of work, manufacture at site, fixed versus movable furniture, and the extended period. As those issues had already been dealt with in prior Commissioner and Tribunal orders, the impugned order could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with the earlier Tribunal and Commissioner directions. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:37:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341525 The appeal concerned whether the impugned order could stand in light of earlier binding determinations on manufacture by sub-contractors, offloading of work, manufacture at site, fixed versus movable furniture, and the extended period. As those issues had already been dealt with in prior Commissioner and Tribunal orders, the impugned order could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with the earlier Tribunal and Commissioner directions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341525