https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341520 Exemption under Notification No. 64/95-CE was denied for goods supplied to IOCL for onward supply to the Indian Navy because departmental permission covered only the appellant's own depots and installations, and no permission existed for the impugned mode of supply; the duty demand was upheld to that extent. The portion of the demand said to relate to clearances under CT-2/AR3A certificates was not examined by the original authority, so that limited issue was remanded for factual verification and fresh adjudication. In light of the partial remand and factual background, the penalties were set aside. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341520 Exemption under Notification No. 64/95-CE was denied for goods supplied to IOCL for onward supply to the Indian Navy because departmental permission covered only the appellant's own depots and installations, and no permission existed for the impugned mode of supply; the duty demand was upheld to that extent. The portion of the demand said to relate to clearances under CT-2/AR3A certificates was not examined by the original authority, so that limited issue was remanded for factual verification and fresh adjudication. In light of the partial remand and factual background, the penalties were set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341520