<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 475 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341505</link>
    <description>Money-laundering liability extends beyond the person who committed the scheduled offence to anyone who knowingly assists, participates in, conceals, possesses, uses or projects proceeds of crime. Bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act must satisfy the mandatory conditions under section 45, which override the general bail power under the Code of Criminal Procedure through the Act&#039;s overriding provisions. On a prima facie finding that the accused was involved in laundering proceeds generated from a scheduled corruption offence, bail was refused; contrary authorities relied upon were treated as factually inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 475 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341505</link>
      <description>Money-laundering liability extends beyond the person who committed the scheduled offence to anyone who knowingly assists, participates in, conceals, possesses, uses or projects proceeds of crime. Bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act must satisfy the mandatory conditions under section 45, which override the general bail power under the Code of Criminal Procedure through the Act&#039;s overriding provisions. On a prima facie finding that the accused was involved in laundering proceeds generated from a scheduled corruption offence, bail was refused; contrary authorities relied upon were treated as factually inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>