<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7497</link>
    <description>A Hindu undivided family is wider than a coparcenary and may exist even with a sole male member together with female members, including a widow, wife or unmarried daughters. Property that has once belonged to a joint family does not lose its joint family character merely because the family is reduced to a single coparcener, so long as the family subsists and the property has not been clearly treated as self-acquired or thrown into the common stock otherwise. Applying these principles, the assessee remained joint with his widowed mother and the property retained its joint family character for tax purposes; the correct status was a Hindu undivided family, not an individual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7497</link>
      <description>A Hindu undivided family is wider than a coparcenary and may exist even with a sole male member together with female members, including a widow, wife or unmarried daughters. Property that has once belonged to a joint family does not lose its joint family character merely because the family is reduced to a single coparcener, so long as the family subsists and the property has not been clearly treated as self-acquired or thrown into the common stock otherwise. Applying these principles, the assessee remained joint with his widowed mother and the property retained its joint family character for tax purposes; the correct status was a Hindu undivided family, not an individual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>