<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 461 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the subsidy received from the Maharashtra State Government was capital in nature and should not be reduced from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation. The Tribunal also reduced the ad hoc disallowance of advertising and sales promotion expenses from Rs. 19,42,224 to Rs. 5 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 461 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the subsidy received from the Maharashtra State Government was capital in nature and should not be reduced from the cost of assets for depreciation calculation. The Tribunal also reduced the ad hoc disallowance of advertising and sales promotion expenses from Rs. 19,42,224 to Rs. 5 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>