<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (10) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191636</link>
    <description>Section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 permits a Magistrate to act on information from any source; receipt of information merely triggers a judicial enquiry and is not limited to a special police officer. The provision distinguishes conduct creating public nuisance from conduct that does not, a classification linked to suppressing immoral traffic and protecting public morals. Notice, evidence, judicial inquiry and revisional control provide safeguards against arbitrary action. Restrictions on movement and residence, including removal from a jurisdiction where necessary, operate through judicial process and may be reasonable in the interests of public health, morals and the general public.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (10) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191636</link>
      <description>Section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 permits a Magistrate to act on information from any source; receipt of information merely triggers a judicial enquiry and is not limited to a special police officer. The provision distinguishes conduct creating public nuisance from conduct that does not, a classification linked to suppressing immoral traffic and protecting public morals. Notice, evidence, judicial inquiry and revisional control provide safeguards against arbitrary action. Restrictions on movement and residence, including removal from a jurisdiction where necessary, operate through judicial process and may be reasonable in the interests of public health, morals and the general public.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>