<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 21 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7492</link>
    <description>The court found discrepancies in the sale proceedings related to income-tax recovery, including violations of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961. The auction conducted by the unauthorized Tahsildar and irregularities in the process led to the quashing of the auction sale. The court ordered the property to remain under attachment for fresh recovery proceedings to be carried out in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 21 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7492</link>
      <description>The court found discrepancies in the sale proceedings related to income-tax recovery, including violations of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961. The auction conducted by the unauthorized Tahsildar and irregularities in the process led to the quashing of the auction sale. The court ordered the property to remain under attachment for fresh recovery proceedings to be carried out in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>