<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1277 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191625</link>
    <description>A statutory body whose dominant objects are planned urban development and public improvement remains an of general public utility where its income from land, property, charges, or allied activities is incidental and earmarked for those objects. The statutory enquiry under registration provisions is limited to the objects and genuineness of activities, and not final exemption. The first proviso to Section 2(15) applies only when trade, commerce, or business is carried on in substance as the primary commercial activity. On these facts, the bodies were charitable institutions and denial of registration under Sections 12A and 12AA was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1277 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191625</link>
      <description>A statutory body whose dominant objects are planned urban development and public improvement remains an of general public utility where its income from land, property, charges, or allied activities is incidental and earmarked for those objects. The statutory enquiry under registration provisions is limited to the objects and genuineness of activities, and not final exemption. The first proviso to Section 2(15) applies only when trade, commerce, or business is carried on in substance as the primary commercial activity. On these facts, the bodies were charitable institutions and denial of registration under Sections 12A and 12AA was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>