<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Banker&#039;s Cheques Valid u/s 40A(3) and Rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34239</link>
    <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - AO opined that banker’s cheques were not covered in any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules as they were the account payee demand drafts u/s 40A(3) - the expression used in the Income Tax itself is “a bill of exchange”, which is a class of instruments, that cannot be ignored or disallowed by virtue of Section 40A(3) read with Rules 6 DD of the Income Tax Rules - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:24:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Banker&#039;s Cheques Valid u/s 40A(3) and Rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34239</link>
      <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - AO opined that banker’s cheques were not covered in any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules as they were the account payee demand drafts u/s 40A(3) - the expression used in the Income Tax itself is “a bill of exchange”, which is a class of instruments, that cannot be ignored or disallowed by virtue of Section 40A(3) read with Rules 6 DD of the Income Tax Rules - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:24:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>