<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 448 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the initiation of re-assessment proceedings under section 147, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s contentions. It ruled that no interest under section 234B was chargeable due to the non-resident status of the Assessee. However, it upheld the charging of interest under section 220(2) as per the CBDT Circular. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 448 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the initiation of re-assessment proceedings under section 147, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s contentions. It ruled that no interest under section 234B was chargeable due to the non-resident status of the Assessee. However, it upheld the charging of interest under section 220(2) as per the CBDT Circular. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>