<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals in both cases, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on raw materials and remanding the matter concerning imported capital goods for further verification. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the specific provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules in determining the eligibility for Cenvat credit on different items at the time of de-bonding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals in both cases, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on raw materials and remanding the matter concerning imported capital goods for further verification. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the specific provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules in determining the eligibility for Cenvat credit on different items at the time of de-bonding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>