<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing cenvat credit and imposing a penalty on the appellant. The lack of conclusive evidence of non-receipt of goods and discrepancies in findings in related cases led to ruling in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence in such cases, ultimately overturning the decision against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing cenvat credit and imposing a penalty on the appellant. The lack of conclusive evidence of non-receipt of goods and discrepancies in findings in related cases led to ruling in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence in such cases, ultimately overturning the decision against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>