<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Accused Can Rebut Presumption; Complainant Must Prove Debt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34240</link>
    <description>The offence u/s 138 of the NI Act though technical, is punitive in nature. Hence, once the accused had rebutted the initial presumption it was imperative upon the complainant to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the cheques were issued towards the existing debt or liability - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:20:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Accused Can Rebut Presumption; Complainant Must Prove Debt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34240</link>
      <description>The offence u/s 138 of the NI Act though technical, is punitive in nature. Hence, once the accused had rebutted the initial presumption it was imperative upon the complainant to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the cheques were issued towards the existing debt or liability - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:20:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>