<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341448</link>
    <description>An inspection machine used in a form, fill and seal line for PET bottles was treated as part of the composite bottling system rather than a stand-alone testing instrument. Because its checking function was incidental to filling, sealing and allied packing operations, Heading 8422 applied and Heading 9031 was not sustainable. On that basis, the machine also qualified for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalties founded on the wrong classification could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 418 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341448</link>
      <description>An inspection machine used in a form, fill and seal line for PET bottles was treated as part of the composite bottling system rather than a stand-alone testing instrument. Because its checking function was incidental to filling, sealing and allied packing operations, Heading 8422 applied and Heading 9031 was not sustainable. On that basis, the machine also qualified for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalties founded on the wrong classification could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>