<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7484</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the additional surcharge on residual income imposed by the Income-tax Officer on a cooperative bank for the assessment year 1963-64. The court determined that the Finance Act could subject exempt income to such surcharge, even if the income was exempt from regular income tax under the Income-tax Act. The court clarified that exempt income formed part of the total income and could be subject to additional surcharge. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pay costs and counsel&#039;s fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7484</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the additional surcharge on residual income imposed by the Income-tax Officer on a cooperative bank for the assessment year 1963-64. The court determined that the Finance Act could subject exempt income to such surcharge, even if the income was exempt from regular income tax under the Income-tax Act. The court clarified that exempt income formed part of the total income and could be subject to additional surcharge. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pay costs and counsel&#039;s fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>