<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1630 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191609</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the respondent was not required to pay service tax in cash and could use Cenvat credit for tax payment. The Court found no grounds for interference, based on the precedents cited and the legal provisions governing the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1630 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191609</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the respondent was not required to pay service tax in cash and could use Cenvat credit for tax payment. The Court found no grounds for interference, based on the precedents cited and the legal provisions governing the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>