<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1218 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal due to the invalidity of the revision orders under the amended provision, emphasizing the importance of adherence to the prevailing legal framework for invoking revisionary powers and subsequent appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 09:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1218 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal due to the invalidity of the revision orders under the amended provision, emphasizing the importance of adherence to the prevailing legal framework for invoking revisionary powers and subsequent appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>