<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Investment Deduction Claim u/s 54F Valid Within Extended Deadline of Section 139(4.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34212</link>
    <description>Clam of deduction u/s 54F - assessee made the investment within the due date prescribed under section 139(4) and it was held that section 54 or section 54F for that reason uses the word &quot;section 139&quot;, which meant not only section 139(1) but also section 139(4). Therefore, a larger time-limit was available to the assessee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:12:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Deduction Claim u/s 54F Valid Within Extended Deadline of Section 139(4.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34212</link>
      <description>Clam of deduction u/s 54F - assessee made the investment within the due date prescribed under section 139(4) and it was held that section 54 or section 54F for that reason uses the word &quot;section 139&quot;, which meant not only section 139(1) but also section 139(4). Therefore, a larger time-limit was available to the assessee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 08:12:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>