https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341444 The High Court ruled in favor of the department on issues 1, 2, and 3, affirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals). However, on issue 4 concerning the alleged agricultural income of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the ITAT's decision regarding the claim. The appeal was partly allowed, with the court upholding the addition of undisclosed income in the hands of the assessee but accepting the claim of agricultural income for the HUF. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341444 The High Court ruled in favor of the department on issues 1, 2, and 3, affirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals). However, on issue 4 concerning the alleged agricultural income of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the ITAT's decision regarding the claim. The appeal was partly allowed, with the court upholding the addition of undisclosed income in the hands of the assessee but accepting the claim of agricultural income for the HUF. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341444