<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 413 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341443</link>
    <description>The High Court interpreted provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding capital gains, specifically addressing the classification of non-compete fees as capital or revenue receipts. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the non-compete fee received was a capital receipt and not subject to income tax. The Court referred to legislative amendments and relevant case law to support its decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 413 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341443</link>
      <description>The High Court interpreted provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding capital gains, specifically addressing the classification of non-compete fees as capital or revenue receipts. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the non-compete fee received was a capital receipt and not subject to income tax. The Court referred to legislative amendments and relevant case law to support its decision, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>