<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341438</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions under Section 40A(2)(b) of Rs. 1,31,00,000 and on undisclosed income from the sale of additional area of 2750 sq ft. The CIT(A) found lack of factual basis and corroborative evidence for the additions, citing commercial considerations and fair market value. The ITAT concurred, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s disclosures and the AO&#039;s presumption without concrete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341438</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions under Section 40A(2)(b) of Rs. 1,31,00,000 and on undisclosed income from the sale of additional area of 2750 sq ft. The CIT(A) found lack of factual basis and corroborative evidence for the additions, citing commercial considerations and fair market value. The ITAT concurred, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s disclosures and the AO&#039;s presumption without concrete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>