<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 393 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341423</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The AO had adequately examined all relevant issues and chose to estimate net profit consciously. Consequently, the ITAT overturned the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263 and reinstated the original assessment order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 07:33:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 393 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341423</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The AO had adequately examined all relevant issues and chose to estimate net profit consciously. Consequently, the ITAT overturned the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263 and reinstated the original assessment order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>