<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 391 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341421</link>
    <description>Existence of a permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-US DTAA could not be finally determined because the factual record on the Indian branch&#039;s activities was unclear and inconsistent, with conflicting findings on stock maintenance, contracting authority, invoicing and support functions. The tribunal therefore remanded the PE issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after proper factual inquiry and application of treaty principles. Because the software maintenance fee, fee for included services, royalty treatment and attribution questions depended on the PE finding, those connected issues were also sent back for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 07:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 391 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341421</link>
      <description>Existence of a permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-US DTAA could not be finally determined because the factual record on the Indian branch&#039;s activities was unclear and inconsistent, with conflicting findings on stock maintenance, contracting authority, invoicing and support functions. The tribunal therefore remanded the PE issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after proper factual inquiry and application of treaty principles. Because the software maintenance fee, fee for included services, royalty treatment and attribution questions depended on the PE finding, those connected issues were also sent back for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>