<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 390 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order as void ab initio and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer had not applied his mind and had reopened the case based on borrowed satisfaction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the AO to independently verify information before forming a belief that income had escaped assessment, citing legal precedents. The order was pronounced on September 15, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 390 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order as void ab initio and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer had not applied his mind and had reopened the case based on borrowed satisfaction. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the AO to independently verify information before forming a belief that income had escaped assessment, citing legal precedents. The order was pronounced on September 15, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>