<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 387 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341417</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the dismissal of an appeal due to delay, emphasizing the relevance of a corrigendum in computing the limitation period. Despite the general rule against condoning delays exceeding 30 days, the court considered the corrigendum&#039;s impact in rectifying errors and bringing the appeal within the limitation period. Relying on precedents and highlighting the importance of the corrected date, the court directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to assess the appeal on its merits, setting aside the initial dismissal without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 387 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341417</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the dismissal of an appeal due to delay, emphasizing the relevance of a corrigendum in computing the limitation period. Despite the general rule against condoning delays exceeding 30 days, the court considered the corrigendum&#039;s impact in rectifying errors and bringing the appeal within the limitation period. Relying on precedents and highlighting the importance of the corrected date, the court directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to assess the appeal on its merits, setting aside the initial dismissal without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>