https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341404 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision in an appeal filed by the Revenue regarding alleged clandestine removal based on seized records. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented lacked independent corroboration, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence to prove such serious charges. The judgment highlighted the importance of a robust evidentiary foundation and rejected the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the need for substantial and corroborated evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities. en-us Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Apr 2017 07:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341404 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision in an appeal filed by the Revenue regarding alleged clandestine removal based on seized records. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented lacked independent corroboration, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence to prove such serious charges. The judgment highlighted the importance of a robust evidentiary foundation and rejected the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the need for substantial and corroborated evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341404