<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 371 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties imposed on exporters for misdeclaring non-Basmati Rice as Basmati Rice. Revenue&#039;s appeals for enhanced penalties were remanded for reconsideration. Appeals by some individuals and entities against penalties were dismissed, while others were remanded for further review. The Tribunal stressed compliance with DGFT notifications and Basmati Rice export standards to prevent misdeclaration and ensure regulatory compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 371 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties imposed on exporters for misdeclaring non-Basmati Rice as Basmati Rice. Revenue&#039;s appeals for enhanced penalties were remanded for reconsideration. Appeals by some individuals and entities against penalties were dismissed, while others were remanded for further review. The Tribunal stressed compliance with DGFT notifications and Basmati Rice export standards to prevent misdeclaration and ensure regulatory compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>