https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341393 The High Court examined challenges to the resolution passed by the Bar Council of India calling for abstaining from court work as a protest against a proposed amendment Bill. The Court emphasized lawyers' duty to find alternative protest methods without disrupting court proceedings, citing legal precedents. It differentiated between local Bar Association strikes and national Bar Council calls, highlighting the legislative process for proposed amendments. The judgment underscored lawyers' responsibility to uphold the legal system's integrity and urged them to address grievances judiciously, ultimately dismissing the petitions and emphasizing adherence to the Apex Court's directions. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341393 The High Court examined challenges to the resolution passed by the Bar Council of India calling for abstaining from court work as a protest against a proposed amendment Bill. The Court emphasized lawyers' duty to find alternative protest methods without disrupting court proceedings, citing legal precedents. It differentiated between local Bar Association strikes and national Bar Council calls, highlighting the legislative process for proposed amendments. The judgment underscored lawyers' responsibility to uphold the legal system's integrity and urged them to address grievances judiciously, ultimately dismissing the petitions and emphasizing adherence to the Apex Court's directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341393