<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 989 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191586</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay admitted the case to consider whether gutka qualifies as a tobacco preparation under the Eleventh Schedule, impacting the Appellant&#039;s claimed deductions under sections 80-1 and 80-1A of the Act. Additionally, the Court assessed if the Tribunal&#039;s decision, influenced by new arguments not previously raised, infringed upon principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 989 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191586</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay admitted the case to consider whether gutka qualifies as a tobacco preparation under the Eleventh Schedule, impacting the Appellant&#039;s claimed deductions under sections 80-1 and 80-1A of the Act. Additionally, the Court assessed if the Tribunal&#039;s decision, influenced by new arguments not previously raised, infringed upon principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>