https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191582 A transfer of raiyati interest that was initially within the mischief of the Santhal Parganas Settlement Regulation, 1872 was treated as regularised because the competent revenue authority issued notice, considered the mutation and clearance, and approved it. That approval created an accrued right in the transferee. On repeal of section 27 by the Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949, there was no contrary intention to disturb rights already acquired or acts duly done, so the saving principle preserved that right. The transferee's later conveyance of the entire right, title and interest was therefore not invalid under the 1949 Act, and the eviction proceedings could not be sustained. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191582 A transfer of raiyati interest that was initially within the mischief of the Santhal Parganas Settlement Regulation, 1872 was treated as regularised because the competent revenue authority issued notice, considered the mutation and clearance, and approved it. That approval created an accrued right in the transferee. On repeal of section 27 by the Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949, there was no contrary intention to disturb rights already acquired or acts duly done, so the saving principle preserved that right. The transferee's later conveyance of the entire right, title and interest was therefore not invalid under the 1949 Act, and the eviction proceedings could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191582