<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1629 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191581</link>
    <description>Bail in a serious economic offence may be cancelled where it is granted without the mandatory notice to the public prosecutor under Section 439(1) CrPC, without meaningful consideration of prosecution material, or in a manner that appears perverse. The record indicated attempts to intimidate witnesses and influence the investigation, and the gravity of the offence involving public funds supported cancellation. The objection to the complainant-side respondents&#039; locus was rejected because an application under Section 482 CrPC was maintainable to prevent miscarriage of justice. On the same material, transfer of the trial outside the district was held appropriate to secure a free and fair trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1629 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191581</link>
      <description>Bail in a serious economic offence may be cancelled where it is granted without the mandatory notice to the public prosecutor under Section 439(1) CrPC, without meaningful consideration of prosecution material, or in a manner that appears perverse. The record indicated attempts to intimidate witnesses and influence the investigation, and the gravity of the offence involving public funds supported cancellation. The objection to the complainant-side respondents&#039; locus was rejected because an application under Section 482 CrPC was maintainable to prevent miscarriage of justice. On the same material, transfer of the trial outside the district was held appropriate to secure a free and fair trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>