https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191576 The court held that the plaintiff, a recognized Stock Exchange, had the right to prevent another organization from conducting similar business within its operational area. The court found the suit maintainable in civil court, as the plaintiff was enforcing its exclusive right under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act. It was determined that the plaintiff had a prima facie case and cause of action for violations of Sections 13 and 19 of the Act. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, leading to a modification of the trial court's order to restrict the defendants from engaging in certain activities until the suit's disposal. en-us Tue, 31 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191576 The court held that the plaintiff, a recognized Stock Exchange, had the right to prevent another organization from conducting similar business within its operational area. The court found the suit maintainable in civil court, as the plaintiff was enforcing its exclusive right under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act. It was determined that the plaintiff had a prima facie case and cause of action for violations of Sections 13 and 19 of the Act. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, leading to a modification of the trial court's order to restrict the defendants from engaging in certain activities until the suit's disposal. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 31 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191576