<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (11) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191566</link>
    <description>A statutory remedy for rectification of the register did not exclude a regular civil suit where the share-registration dispute was complex and unsuitable for summary determination. The Companies Act was treated as regulative rather than a complete code barring ordinary suits by implication. A court sale of shares was treated as transmission by operation of law, so articles governing voluntary transfers and discretion to refuse registration did not apply. The clause dealing with succession on death was confined to executors or administrators and did not apply to a purchaser at court sale. The purchaser was therefore entitled to registration of the shares and consequential dividend relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (11) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191566</link>
      <description>A statutory remedy for rectification of the register did not exclude a regular civil suit where the share-registration dispute was complex and unsuitable for summary determination. The Companies Act was treated as regulative rather than a complete code barring ordinary suits by implication. A court sale of shares was treated as transmission by operation of law, so articles governing voluntary transfers and discretion to refuse registration did not apply. The clause dealing with succession on death was confined to executors or administrators and did not apply to a purchaser at court sale. The purchaser was therefore entitled to registration of the shares and consequential dividend relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>