https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191559 Revisional interference with a Magistrate's reasoned order accepting a police closure report is confined to cases of perversity, patent illegality, gross unreasonableness, absence of material, or failure to consider relevant material; a revisional court cannot simply substitute a different view. The Magistrate's task at cognizance is to see whether there is sufficient ground to proceed, not whether conviction is likely. The text also states that sanction for prosecution lies within the competent authority's independent discretion on the material before it, and a court cannot compel a sanction request or direct prosecution where the material does not disclose a sustainable case. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:09:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191559 Revisional interference with a Magistrate's reasoned order accepting a police closure report is confined to cases of perversity, patent illegality, gross unreasonableness, absence of material, or failure to consider relevant material; a revisional court cannot simply substitute a different view. The Magistrate's task at cognizance is to see whether there is sufficient ground to proceed, not whether conviction is likely. The text also states that sanction for prosecution lies within the competent authority's independent discretion on the material before it, and a court cannot compel a sanction request or direct prosecution where the material does not disclose a sustainable case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191559