<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify if investments in sister concerns were made out of interest-free funds for strategic reasons. If the investments were strategic and not for earning exempt income, the addition under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D was to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify if investments in sister concerns were made out of interest-free funds for strategic reasons. If the investments were strategic and not for earning exempt income, the addition under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D was to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>