<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 357 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341387</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld additions made by the Assessing Officer for undisclosed income, unexplained money, and undisclosed receivables. The appellant failed to provide evidence to challenge these additions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. It emphasizes the necessity of presenting substantial evidence to contest such additions during assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 357 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341387</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld additions made by the Assessing Officer for undisclosed income, unexplained money, and undisclosed receivables. The appellant failed to provide evidence to challenge these additions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. It emphasizes the necessity of presenting substantial evidence to contest such additions during assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>