<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to allow depreciation on assets leased out, except for motor vehicles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to rebut evidence and highlighted that penalties should not be imposed for debatable issues. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to allow depreciation on assets leased out, except for motor vehicles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to rebut evidence and highlighted that penalties should not be imposed for debatable issues. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>