https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341373 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, remitting various issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Key matters included the treatment of depreciation on intangible assets acquired from Orchid India, non-compete fee eligibility, expenses for capacity expansion, pricing adjustments for shipments, interest benchmarking for ICCD, profit-sharing ratio adjustments based on a Settlement Commission order, and the application of Section 92A(2)(i) for sales made to third parties. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the law in reconsidering these issues. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 May 2017 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341373 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, remitting various issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Key matters included the treatment of depreciation on intangible assets acquired from Orchid India, non-compete fee eligibility, expenses for capacity expansion, pricing adjustments for shipments, interest benchmarking for ICCD, profit-sharing ratio adjustments based on a Settlement Commission order, and the application of Section 92A(2)(i) for sales made to third parties. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the law in reconsidering these issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341373