<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 342 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, granting the assessee the benefit of deductions under sections 54 and 54F for the investment in the combined residential unit. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions and the need for thorough and relevant enquiries by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:05:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 342 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, granting the assessee the benefit of deductions under sections 54 and 54F for the investment in the combined residential unit. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions and the need for thorough and relevant enquiries by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>