<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341363</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that recovery proceedings against the legal heir of a deceased sole proprietress were not maintainable. The court disallowed the attachment of immovable property in execution of an adjudication order against the sole proprietary concern. The court directed the Revenue to pursue legal proceedings under general law for enforcement, leaving all contentions on the matter open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341363</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that recovery proceedings against the legal heir of a deceased sole proprietress were not maintainable. The court disallowed the attachment of immovable property in execution of an adjudication order against the sole proprietary concern. The court directed the Revenue to pursue legal proceedings under general law for enforcement, leaving all contentions on the matter open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>