<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 329 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341359</link>
    <description>Spent solvents and industrial waste cleared during bulk drug manufacturing were held not to be excisable goods because the record did not show that they emerged as a distinct, new and identifiable commodity through a process amounting to manufacture. The absence of sample testing to prove alleged high purity, and the fact that mere possibility of later use by others did not establish excisability, meant the departmental appeal had no merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 329 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341359</link>
      <description>Spent solvents and industrial waste cleared during bulk drug manufacturing were held not to be excisable goods because the record did not show that they emerged as a distinct, new and identifiable commodity through a process amounting to manufacture. The absence of sample testing to prove alleged high purity, and the fact that mere possibility of later use by others did not establish excisability, meant the departmental appeal had no merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>