<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 328 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341358</link>
    <description>Cotton waste generated during carding, combing and ginning was treated as a by-product that did not emerge as a distinct new product. Unconditionally exempt waste under Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. could not be counted within the 50% FOB value ceiling for DTA clearances under the Exim Policy, and no central excise duty was payable on such exempt clearances. The Revenue challenge therefore failed, and the demand was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 328 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341358</link>
      <description>Cotton waste generated during carding, combing and ginning was treated as a by-product that did not emerge as a distinct new product. Unconditionally exempt waste under Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. could not be counted within the 50% FOB value ceiling for DTA clearances under the Exim Policy, and no central excise duty was payable on such exempt clearances. The Revenue challenge therefore failed, and the demand was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>