<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 325 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties and duty demands on the main appellant and partner for unaccounted manufacture and clearance of dutiable items. The evidence from suppliers and the appellant&#039;s partner, corroborated by responsible individuals, was crucial in establishing clandestine activities. The appellants&#039; challenges on the voluntariness of statements and lack of corroboration were rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating each piece of evidence and deemed the evidence presented as substantial and credible, dismissing the appeals and upholding penalties and duty demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 325 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties and duty demands on the main appellant and partner for unaccounted manufacture and clearance of dutiable items. The evidence from suppliers and the appellant&#039;s partner, corroborated by responsible individuals, was crucial in establishing clandestine activities. The appellants&#039; challenges on the voluntariness of statements and lack of corroboration were rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating each piece of evidence and deemed the evidence presented as substantial and credible, dismissing the appeals and upholding penalties and duty demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>