https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341350 The Appellate Tribunal corrected errors in reproducing Section 35F in an order dated 3-6-2016, noting the outdated version of the section included in the order. The Tribunal emphasized that the amended Section 35F, post 6-8-2014, excluded interest payable from the definition of "duty demanded." Additionally, discrepancies in the appeal memorandum led to an incorrect approach, resulting in modifications to the order. The revised order clarified deposit requirements, ultimately discharging the notice issued to the appellant as the dispute solely concerned interest, eliminating the need for pre-deposit. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2017 14:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341350 The Appellate Tribunal corrected errors in reproducing Section 35F in an order dated 3-6-2016, noting the outdated version of the section included in the order. The Tribunal emphasized that the amended Section 35F, post 6-8-2014, excluded interest payable from the definition of "duty demanded." Additionally, discrepancies in the appeal memorandum led to an incorrect approach, resulting in modifications to the order. The revised order clarified deposit requirements, ultimately discharging the notice issued to the appellant as the dispute solely concerned interest, eliminating the need for pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341350