<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 308 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341338</link>
    <description>Reversal of input tax credit under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was challenged as unsustainable. The court treated the issue as already covered by an earlier decision in favour of the assessee, and the parties accepted that position. The assessment order therefore could not stand to the extent it reversed the credit, and that limited issue was set aside and remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration in line with the earlier ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:02:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 308 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341338</link>
      <description>Reversal of input tax credit under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was challenged as unsustainable. The court treated the issue as already covered by an earlier decision in favour of the assessee, and the parties accepted that position. The assessment order therefore could not stand to the extent it reversed the credit, and that limited issue was set aside and remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration in line with the earlier ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>