<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191535</link>
    <description>Liquidation distributions were treated as dividend only to the extent attributable to accumulated profits immediately before liquidation, with the word &quot;immediately&quot; extending the charge to profits standing to the company&#039;s credit up to the liquidation date. The statutory explanation excluded only capital gains expressly carved out, so other capital gains remained within accumulated profits. However, proceeds from the sale of land yielding agricultural income could not be treated as capital gains under section 12B, and the assessing authority had to apportion composite sale proceeds between taxable and non-taxable components before raising a demand. The demand as framed was therefore not in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191535</link>
      <description>Liquidation distributions were treated as dividend only to the extent attributable to accumulated profits immediately before liquidation, with the word &quot;immediately&quot; extending the charge to profits standing to the company&#039;s credit up to the liquidation date. The statutory explanation excluded only capital gains expressly carved out, so other capital gains remained within accumulated profits. However, proceeds from the sale of land yielding agricultural income could not be treated as capital gains under section 12B, and the assessing authority had to apportion composite sale proceeds between taxable and non-taxable components before raising a demand. The demand as framed was therefore not in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>