<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 59 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191527</link>
    <description>A writ of certiorari may be issued where an inferior tribunal commits an obvious error of law by refusing to consider a factor that is legally relevant to the statutory decision it must make. In deciding applications for stage carriage permits, the transport authority had to consider public interest and other relevant matters under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Government directions under Section 43-A were administrative only and could not justify ignoring a relevant consideration. The tribunal&#039;s view that a branch office on the route could not be treated as such because the applicant company had another branch elsewhere was legally untenable, so the order was properly quashed for fresh decision on the relevant issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 59 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191527</link>
      <description>A writ of certiorari may be issued where an inferior tribunal commits an obvious error of law by refusing to consider a factor that is legally relevant to the statutory decision it must make. In deciding applications for stage carriage permits, the transport authority had to consider public interest and other relevant matters under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Government directions under Section 43-A were administrative only and could not justify ignoring a relevant consideration. The tribunal&#039;s view that a branch office on the route could not be treated as such because the applicant company had another branch elsewhere was legally untenable, so the order was properly quashed for fresh decision on the relevant issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>